No. 41

Some ponder long upon the path of creed,
Some, seemingly, claim certainty indeed;
I fear the day a cry may rise and say:
“O heedless minds! The path is neither of these you heed.”  *

Philosophical Reflection

This quatrain presents one of Khayyam’s clearest critiques of dogmatism. Two groups appear before us: those who spend their lives thinking through the route of religion, and those who pursue what they call certainty — often the path of philosophy, science, or rational inquiry. Both are depicted as sincere yet ultimately limited. Khayyam does not privilege one over the other. Each claims access to truth, yet each stands on incomplete ground.

The turning point comes in the third line: “I fear the day…” Here Khayyam introduces his anxiety that a decisive revelation — or a moment of reckoning — may overturn the assumptions of both groups. The imagined cry, “O heedless minds!” strikes at the heart of human intellectual confidence. It is not a mockery of belief nor a rejection of reason; rather, it is an acknowledgement that both systems, when held with rigidity, can lead to blindness.

The final line contains the quatrain’s philosophical punch: “The path is neither of these.” Khayyam points to a truth beyond doctrinal certainty and beyond rational finality — a reality that neither camp fully grasps. The criticism is not that religion is false or that certainty is impossible, but that human beings mistake their pathways for absolute truth. Both suffer from the same flaw: the presumption that their method alone captures the whole.

This quatrain’s themes align closely with Doubts Concerning the Bases of Knowledge, where Khayyam interrogates the foundations of truth-claims and warns against intellectual arrogance. It also echoes Treatise on Being, which explores the limits of metaphysical understanding, and The Light of the Intellect on the Subject of Universal Knowledge, where the insufficiency of human categories is laid bare.

Rather than cynicism, the poem offers clarity: the truth of the world may lie outside the dichotomies humans construct. Between religious certainty and rational certainty lies a vast and uncharted middle — the realm of humility. Khayyam’s voice invites the reader not to abandon thought or belief, but to approach both with openness, scepticism, and the awareness that genuine truth may lie along a path neither camp has named.


Footnote

* Source: Trabkhaneh, Homaei, no. 41, translated by Kam Austine for the book Philosophy in Verse

قومی متفکرند اندر ره دین
قومی به گمان فتاده در راه یقین
میترسم از آنکه بانگ آید روزی
که ای بیخبران راه نه آنست و نه این

Related Khayyam’s Treatises:
Doubts Concerning the Bases of Knowledge
Treatise on Being
The Light of the Intellect on the Subject of Universal Knowledge

Internal Themes: #Meaning #Doubt #Epistemology #Challenge


Published as part of the Philosophy in Verse Series — under “Meaning & Doubt.”

Leave a comment

Discover more from Kam Austine

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading